真实讨论 · 值得阅读English

Bright air, brilliant fire

了解 Gerald M. Edelman; Gerlad Edelman 的《Bright air, brilliant fire》(Bright air, brilliant fire):2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 3 次提及、3 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点,将它加入你的书单。

THE HACKERBOOKS LIBRARY
Bright air, brilliant fire
Gerald M. Edelman; Gerlad Edelman
科学与数学

Bright air, brilliant fire

3 次提及 · 3 位讨论者 · 2 位推荐者

图书版本信息

社区里的声音

最近 3 条来源记录

提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类;请打开原始讨论核对上下文。

__0ffh
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
Rrichardatlarge
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
Mmdkersey
普通提及

…ach based on evolution and biology will prove more fruitful than the physical symbol system hypothesis(PSSH) of "good old-fashioned AI". Edelman explicates his ideas in "Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind": ( http://www.amazon.com/Bright-Air-Brilliant-Fire-Matter/dp/0465007643/ref=sr_1_1/103-2087616-1051018?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1182842907&sr=1-1). In that book he clearly states his objections to the PSSH. There is significant recent work on consciousness, tying it to neuroscience studies of the brain. Bernard J. Baars' explications of Global Workspace theory appear fruitful in leading us toward conscious computing. Right now I'm reading one of Baars' books, "In the Theater of Consciousness: The Workspace of the Mind": http://www.amazon.com/Theater-Consciousness-Workspace-Mind/dp/0195147030/ref=sr_1_1/102-9391404-9424956?…

在 Hacker News 阅读原文