Reading rate
了解 Ronald P. Carver 的《Reading rate》（Reading rate）：2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 4 次提及、2 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点，将它加入你的书单。
分享到 X社区里的声音
最近 4 条来源记录提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类；请打开原始讨论核对上下文。
此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文Take a look at "Reading Rate: A Review of Research and Theory" by Ronald P. Carver http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Rate-Review-Research-Theory/dp... The conclusion is, basically, that speed reading courses don't work. You can teach people to skim at a faster rate than they'd read with maximum comprehension and retention. And you can teach people study skills, such as how to summarize salient points, and take notes. But all these skills are not at all the same as what speed reading usually promises, which is to drastically increase the rate at which you read with full comprehension and retention. According to Carver's book, it can't be done, at least not drastically past about the rate you'd naturally read at the college level. Check out the book for a much more comprehensive explanation and analysis.
在 Hacker News 阅读原文According to "Reading rate: a review of research and theory" by Ronald P. Carver, speed reading (not to be confused with mere skimming) doesn't work. See: http://www.amazon.com/Reading-Rate-Review-Research-Theory/dp...
在 Hacker News 阅读原文