On the psychology of military incompetence
了解 Norman F. Dixon; Norman Dixon 的《On the psychology of military incompetence》（On the psychology of military incompetence）：2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 4 次提及、2 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点，将它加入你的书单。
分享到 X社区里的声音
最近 4 条来源记录提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类；请打开原始讨论核对上下文。
此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接，请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。
在 Hacker News 阅读原文…studying Marxism is an individual act of revolution. The mental impact on one's mind, when you finally get it , is irreversible. "Class Consciousness" is a revolutionary virus of the mind. Thank goodness for a healthy mental immune system, then. Proponents of Marxist thought seem to believe that because they've found there's a different way of looking at the world that explains some things better than their default view, it must thus be correct in all respects. Pointing out that one has simply swapped one kind of tunnel vision for another tends to be poorly received. This is not to say the study of Marx is without value, but I'm being a lot kinder to Marxism here than Marxists are towards their perceived 'class enemies'. Anyway yes, the reading list is underwhelming. 4 works about Mao, but nothing by Mao himself, or by Che Guevara? Disqua…
在 Hacker News 阅读原文IME 'you're overqualified' = authoritarian management. A classic book worth reading is 'On the psychology of military incompetence' by Norman F. Dixon, if you don't mind extrapolating the observations to other contexts.
在 Hacker News 阅读原文