We the living
Explore We the living by Ayn Rand: 20 Hacker News mentions from 17 participants in 2007-02-22–2026-11-01. Read original excerpts, compare opinions and save this book.
Share on XFrom the conversation
Latest 20 source recordsA mention is not an endorsement. Labels are automatically classified by the source. Follow the original discussion to verify the context.
This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker NewsThis record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.
Read on Hacker News…o not exist for him and he does not understand why they should." So she modeled her initial Randian Hero after the psychopath. In the original version of her first novel We the Living: "What are your masses [of humanity] but mud to be ground underfoot, fuel to be burned for those who deserve it?" Sounds Jokereqsue, no? Of The Fountainhead's hero, Howard Roark: He "has learned long ago, with his first consciousness, two things which dominate his entire attitude toward life: his own superiority and the utter worthlessness of the world." And: The editor also provides the briefest and most detail-free synopsis of Hickman's crime possible: "He was accused of kidnapping and murdering a young girl. He was found guilty and sentenced to death in February of 1928; he was hanged on October 20, 1928." As far as I can tell, this is the one and only re…
Read on Hacker News…acters, settings, events, or something else -- remain recognizable from reality. But very little in Atlas is, certainly nothing key to the story. We the Living is a much better book than Atlas Shrugged, for what it's worth.
Read on Hacker News…ence. See above. The books in which I could have located a reference are long gone; but it's in one of her short essays (if pushed, I'd suggest that it might be found in For the New Intellectual... but wouldn't want to be held to that). > What definition do you like? From wikipedia: "Different philosophers have had varied ideas about the nature of reason, and there is also disagreement about the subject matter of philosophy." If not even the people who do it professionally can agree on a definition, it would be presumptuous of me to try. Nonetheless, you misread my objection. I am objecting to the assertion that Rand's work is without question philosophy, using the definition of philosophy by which Rand identified herself as one. It's tautological; it begs the question. Likewise, my criticism of Rand is not that her conclusions are not re…
Read on Hacker News…e" is also wonderful, though I don't see that "Anthem" was a ripoff...it's just another take on the same idea, which many others have taken a stab at over the years. And Brave New World and 1984 are completely different from the former to, and from each other. I love dystopian fiction, so I've read tons of it. My current favorite writer in the genre is Margaret Atwood ("Handmaid's Tale" and "Oryx and Crake"). So I guess if you don't really enjoy reading speculative fiction with a gloomy outlook on the future, maybe you only need to read one of them (probably 1984, since it's the one everybody knows), but otherwise, they're all a lot of fun. "We, the Living", I didn't care for. The language is stilted (even more than Atlas and Fountainhead). It was her first real writing in English, and it shows. I never recommend WTL to folks who don't al…
Read on Hacker News…lp polemic, but I do retain a soft spot for WTL. But 'Anthem' was ripped off from 'We' ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_%28novel%29 ) and can't hold a candle to either 'Brave New World' before or '1984' after; its only use is the same as that of 'The Communist Manifesto' (the two works are even as humourless as each other).
Read on Hacker News