Real conversations. Worthwhile reads.中文

Thinking, Fast and Slow

Explore Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman: 1165 Hacker News mentions from 879 participants in 2007-02-22–2026-11-01. Read original excerpts, compare opinions and save this book.

THE HACKERBOOKS LIBRARY
Thinking, Fast and Slow
Daniel Kahneman
Mind & Personal Growth

思考,快与慢

1165 mentions · 879 participants · 373 recommenders

Book edition

From the conversation

Latest 20 source records

A mention is not an endorsement. Labels are automatically classified by the source. Follow the original discussion to verify the context.

Yyndoendo
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
110xDev
Recommendation · source label

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Mmanlymuppet
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Aakst
Recommendation · source label

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
NNoHedgeAllBets
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
TTeMPOraL
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Ssyntaxing
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Ddoctoboggan
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Rromerocarlos
Recommendation · source label

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
KKurtz79
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Zzenlikethat
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Jjasmeet0817
Recommendation · source label

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Oonlyrealcuzzo
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
TTimTheTinker
Mention

…th the real world, then I think we'll have made the final great breakthrough AI needs to become generally intelligent and useful. In terms of Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow , LLMs currently use only System 1 thinking (equivalent to fast, pattern-matched decisions humans make). You can scale that up to trillions of parameters, but fundamentally it's still fancy scaled-up probabilistic pattern matching. Like humans, fast decisions made by AI here only can be justified/audited in retrospect. Integrated ontologies would move AI toward what Kahneman calls "System 2 thinking": slow, logical, systematic evaluation that is more auditable.

Read on Hacker News
Hhoppp
Recommendation · source label

…cious and unconscious are different, and the subconscious has it's own working memory that the conscious can't access. An interesting read is Daniel Kahneman's Thinking Fast and Slow that explains cognitive systems, 1 is subconscious and fast and the other is conscious and slow

Read on Hacker News
Mmahdi7d1
Mention

…ts of a pirated version or some old ancient printed version that have somehow gotten imported (no clue how or is there an actual legal way) I remember opening "thinking fast and slow" and noticing the weird paging. After checking the official version's page count and seeing how the version in my hand doesn't match, my best guess was that someone had printed a pirated epub version.

Read on Hacker News
Oordu
Mention

From that list I've read three books: "A Brief History of Time", "Thinking, Fast and Slow", and "Capital in XXI Century". First two I've read from start to end. The last I didn't read to the end, I think I've read ~50% of it. My numbers correlate with that list, the least "readable" book in the list is the book I didn't read through. However I still doubt the methodology. It is not obvious for me that if a book was read in full, then highlights from it would be distributed uniformly all over the book.

Read on Hacker News
Ssteezeburger
Recommendation · source label

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Ttjasmin111
Recommendation · source label

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News
Sstingraycharles
Mention

This record preserves its author, date and source link. Open HN to read the full context.

Read on Hacker News