真实讨论 · 值得阅读English

Gut Feelings

了解 Gerd Gigerenzer 的《Gut Feelings》(Gut Feelings):2007-02-22–2026-11-01 的 Hacker News 数据中有 5 次提及、4 位讨论者。阅读原文摘录、比较不同观点,将它加入你的书单。

THE HACKERBOOKS LIBRARY
Gut Feelings
Gerd Gigerenzer
思维与成长

Gut Feelings

5 次提及 · 4 位讨论者 · 3 位推荐者

图书版本信息

社区里的声音

最近 5 条来源记录

提及不等于推荐。标签来自源数据的自动分类;请打开原始讨论核对上下文。

Ggtonic
普通提及

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
Bboyd9461
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
GGHFigs
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
GGHFigs
推荐 · 来源标签

此记录保留了作者、时间和来源链接,请打开 HN 阅读完整上下文。

在 Hacker News 阅读原文
Nnostrademons
推荐 · 来源标签

"Why are VCs so conservative? ..." I just read a fascinating book - Gut Feelings by Gerd Gigerenzer. It's by the guy who did most of the research that Malcolm Gladwell's Blink is based upon. The central thesis was that people have evolved heuristics for decision making that let them quickly make snap decisions more effectively than gathering full information, but a couple chapters were on an interesting corollary: in the absence of hard data on their performance, most people's decision-making heuristic falls back to "Will I be blamed for this decision?" He provided a bunch of examples from different professions. For example, doctors' decisions often aren't based on solid evidence-based medicine (which is often contradictory), but rather on "Will I be sued if I do or don't perform this treatment?" If you want the doctor's actual opinion, y…

在 Hacker News 阅读原文